1 00:00:02,000 --> 00:00:07,000 Downloaded from YTS.MX 2 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:13,000 Official YIFY movies site: YTS.MX 3 00:14:36,834 --> 00:14:40,796 Specific to Jack in the Box, how did the burgers get contaminated? 4 00:26:33,425 --> 00:26:34,551 Okay, we ready? 5 00:26:37,137 --> 00:26:40,890 What falls under your jurisdiction? What falls under your jurisdiction? 6 00:27:56,341 --> 00:27:59,094 Ms. Eskin, does the USDA do anything 7 00:27:59,177 --> 00:28:01,221 on these cattle operations 8 00:28:01,304 --> 00:28:05,141 to make sure animal waste isn't getting into the irrigation water? 9 00:28:19,823 --> 00:28:22,075 Feels like a gap in the system. Does it not? 10 00:28:34,003 --> 00:28:36,506 To your response that it's a question for Congress, 11 00:28:36,589 --> 00:28:40,635 would you support legislation that gave USDA jurisdiction on the farm? 12 00:28:50,395 --> 00:28:54,774 Mr. Yiannas, what is the FDA doing to solve the problem, 13 00:28:54,858 --> 00:28:56,860 and should consumers be satisfied? 14 00:29:23,219 --> 00:29:25,638 How should I title you for your position? 15 00:29:27,056 --> 00:29:28,391 - Of? -LGMA. 16 00:29:39,527 --> 00:29:42,280 What are some of the more recognizable handlers 17 00:29:42,363 --> 00:29:45,116 that are part of the LGMA that we might know? 18 00:32:05,298 --> 00:32:08,927 How often do your members test their irrigation water? 19 00:50:54,509 --> 00:50:58,180 Let's just start off with, tell me what you do for work. 20 00:50:58,263 --> 00:51:02,225 I am a USDA consumer safety inspector, 21 00:51:02,309 --> 00:51:04,144 and I inspect chickens. 22 00:51:13,820 --> 00:51:17,407 We run over 300,000 chickens a day. 23 00:51:21,953 --> 00:51:27,250 We're looking at 175 birds a minute, and they're going by so fast. 24 00:51:29,878 --> 00:51:33,006 There's only one inspector at the very end of the line, 25 00:51:33,757 --> 00:51:35,926 and they do miss a lot sometimes. 26 00:51:38,095 --> 00:51:40,180 Some of the plants I've worked at, 27 00:51:40,263 --> 00:51:43,850 I feel like the chicken's not safe to go out. 28 00:51:43,934 --> 00:51:47,437 I feel like consumers would really be shocked 29 00:51:47,521 --> 00:51:50,524 at some of the stories that we could tell them. 30 00:51:52,609 --> 00:51:53,777 I've seen… 31 00:51:53,860 --> 00:51:57,906 …plant person throwing chickens in the chiller 32 00:51:57,989 --> 00:52:00,659 and would have fecal matter in them. 33 00:52:03,578 --> 00:52:08,416 I've seen inspectors sleep on the line and product just going on by. 34 00:52:09,835 --> 00:52:12,796 And you'll see employees, they've been to the bathroom. 35 00:52:12,879 --> 00:52:14,965 They're not washing their hands. 36 00:52:15,048 --> 00:52:16,508 I've seen… 37 00:52:16,591 --> 00:52:21,012 …people drop their knives, not attempt to pick them up and wash it, 38 00:52:21,096 --> 00:52:23,515 just go right back to using it. 39 00:52:25,934 --> 00:52:28,145 They got a quota they gotta meet. 40 00:52:28,228 --> 00:52:32,107 And, you know, I feel like they're there to make a profit 41 00:52:32,190 --> 00:52:33,984 and get the chickens through. 42 00:52:34,067 --> 00:52:36,486 They don't care what shape they're in. 43 00:54:23,176 --> 00:54:25,929 We run millions of birds a month. 44 00:54:26,680 --> 00:54:31,601 We test five salmonella samples a month of a whole bird. 45 00:54:33,228 --> 00:54:37,399 And we do five samples of parts at our plant. 46 00:54:42,320 --> 00:54:44,948 That's all the USDA does. 47 00:54:49,035 --> 00:54:52,497 And just because it says that "USDA inspected" on there, 48 00:54:52,580 --> 00:54:55,917 it don't mean nothing because it's gotta be on their label. 49 00:54:56,001 --> 00:55:00,213 I wouldn't want to eat nothing coming from some of the plants myself. 50 00:57:28,445 --> 00:57:30,196 On our first day of production, 51 00:57:30,280 --> 00:57:32,866 we went to a food safety lab in Seattle. 52 00:57:32,949 --> 00:57:36,327 We picked up five brands of raw chicken and tested them. 53 00:57:36,411 --> 00:57:39,581 And we were told by the lab, "You're not gonna get positive results." 54 00:57:39,664 --> 00:57:40,957 "It's too small of a sample." 55 00:57:41,040 --> 00:57:43,793 We got one positive results, and it was Perdue. 56 00:57:43,877 --> 00:57:46,713 Can I just ask for your reaction to that? 57 00:58:07,317 --> 00:58:11,613 It was infantis*. (*Infantis is an antibiotic resistant strain.) 58 00:58:14,824 --> 00:58:18,119 What do you think would be a fair sample set? 59 00:58:33,635 --> 00:58:38,389 So you're going to be testing 150 chicken parts 60 00:58:38,473 --> 00:58:40,517 for us over the course of five weeks 61 00:58:40,600 --> 00:58:43,978 from the top four major brands in this country. 62 01:04:44,255 --> 01:04:47,258 When you were nominated for your position by President Trump, 63 01:04:47,341 --> 01:04:50,761 a lobbyist for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association said that this was 64 01:04:50,845 --> 01:04:53,055 great news for the industry. 65 01:04:53,139 --> 01:04:55,933 Why was the industry so excited about you in particular? 66 01:05:01,314 --> 01:05:03,816 It had nothing to do with the fact 67 01:05:03,900 --> 01:05:06,611 that you had received a lot of money for your research 68 01:05:06,694 --> 01:05:09,238 from this very same group over the years? 69 01:05:31,844 --> 01:05:35,264 Are you saying it isn't a conflict of interest for you to regulate 70 01:05:35,348 --> 01:05:38,517 the very industry that has funded so many of your studies? 71 01:05:55,701 --> 01:05:58,329 Was your nomination also great news, do you think, 72 01:05:58,412 --> 01:06:01,499 for the consumers that rely on the government to keep their food safe? 73 01:06:30,486 --> 01:06:34,240 Have you made a decision on the Marler petition yet? 74 01:07:14,822 --> 01:07:16,240 She has the authority? 75 01:07:20,995 --> 01:07:22,621 So why doesn't she? 76 01:13:12,137 --> 01:13:14,473 I'm curious if you eat romaine? 77 01:13:16,100 --> 01:13:17,518 Do you eat romaine? 78 01:13:29,655 --> 01:13:32,616 Are there any foods that you both absolutely avoid? 79 01:13:51,969 --> 01:13:54,430 Has the LGMA response prevented 80 01:13:54,513 --> 01:13:56,640 leafy greens outbreaks in your opinion? 81 01:14:02,146 --> 01:14:04,148 Are there any studies that document 82 01:14:04,231 --> 01:14:07,943 the improvement of safety after the implementation of LGMA? 83 01:14:17,828 --> 01:14:20,622 So you say that you feel confident 84 01:14:20,706 --> 01:14:22,416 that it's prevented certain outbreaks-- 85 01:14:23,500 --> 01:14:25,085 I want to run through 86 01:14:26,044 --> 01:14:28,297 some things that have gone down the past five years. 87 01:14:28,380 --> 01:14:31,592 So September 2017, eight people sick from spinach. 88 01:14:31,675 --> 01:14:36,889 November 2017, 67 people sick from another unknown leafy green outbreak. 89 01:14:36,972 --> 01:14:40,642 Then the following year in March, a big one, 248 people, five dead. 90 01:14:40,726 --> 01:14:42,269 April 2018, ten people. 91 01:14:42,352 --> 01:14:45,564 October 2018, three separate leafy green outbreaks, 92 01:14:45,647 --> 01:14:47,065 sickening 135 people. 93 01:14:47,149 --> 01:14:50,027 November, same thing, 167 people sick. 94 01:14:50,110 --> 01:14:52,779 November 2019, two more outbreaks that same year. 95 01:14:52,863 --> 01:14:55,532 October 2020, 40 people. 96 01:14:55,616 --> 01:14:57,659 This isn't a great track record, is it? 97 01:15:38,242 --> 01:15:39,868 I'm being asked to wrap up. 98 01:15:39,952 --> 01:15:43,830 What do you want the viewers to know about this issue?