Highly advanced humans
living thousands of years ago...
unidentified DNA in the human genome...
and ancient chronicles
describing heavenly interventions on Earth.
Did humans really evolve from apes?
Or is our intelligence the result of an otherworldly design?
What are humans made of?
Why do we evolve the way we do, grow the way we do,
think the way we do?
There's no explanation for human beings.
They shouldn't be here on this planet.
Science and the world of history,
even in archeology, is still scrambling around for answers.
We should finally come to grips with the
idea that extraterrestrials had
something to do with our development.
Millions of people around the world believe we have
been visited in the past by extraterrestrial beings.
What if it were true?
Did ancient aliens really help to shape our history?
And if so, might evidence of alien contact help to unlock the
mystery behind the creation of man?
sync and corrections by Bellows www.addic7ed.com
South Africa
25 miles northwest of Johannesburg lie the Malapa Caves.
Here, in August of 2008, paleoanthropologist Lee Berger
and his nine-year-old son Mathew discover several
fossilized skeletal remains of two-million-year-old early
humans, including a female adult and male child, perhaps a
mother and son.
The size and shape of the bones indicate that the individuals
walked upright and had modern hands.
Over the past several decades, scientists have unearthed the
remains of nearly two dozen different types of early human
ancestors, all known as hominids.
We have an extremely good fossil record
of ancient hominids.
and I think the picture emerging from it is
pretty clear that in earlier days, before Homo Sapiens came along
there were typically many different kinds
of hominids coexisting in the world.
We have a hard time giving
our minds around this now because of course
there is just one kind of human on earth today
and there are 7 billion of it
but at one time within the last few hundred thousand years,
you could find two or even three species of hominids
living the same area at the same time.
Most mainstream scholars tell us hominids
evolved from an ape ancestor nearly six million years ago
through what is referred to as natural selection.
This theory of evolution was first popularized by English
anthropologist Charles Darwin in
his 1859 book On the Origin of Species.
Darwin's mechanism of evolution was natural selection.
That is to say a long-term process whereby
better-adapted individuals reproduce more successfully.
Darwin's theory of evolution
by natural selection explained that organism with certain traits
such as mutation
turned out to be actually beneficial
turned out to be of advantage in the struggle for reproduction
So mutation allow organism to survive and
to pass on to the next generation this mutation.
Darwin speculated that over time, hominids walking
on two feet used their hands to make tools.
This, in turn, made them smarter.
Then, approximately 200,000 years ago, hominids evolved into
Homo sapiens... or modern man.
But many scholars dispute Darwin's findings.
We don't see dolphins building cars,
We don't see elephants building houses.
That might sound trite, but it's a fact that these animals just
simply haven't progressed and advanced in the way we have.
And the big question is, why is that?
Why should that happen?
Why should we be so unique?
Tool use doesn't really come into play for
several million years after the first earliest humans began to
walk upright.
And then brain size doesn't really begin to
expand and really mushroom in size until the last several
hundred thousand years.
So, actually six million years of human evolution, there are
millions of years separating each of those major features:
upright posture, tool use, brain expansion.
So Darwin was wrong because he couldn't possibly have known the
chronology in his day.
In 1967, British zoologist Desmond Morris argued
against Darwin's theories on evolution in his book
The Naked Ape.
In it, Morris wrote that there was no reason why man stood
alone from other species in terms of his nudity.
Well, of course, as Homo sapiens we still
continue to have a coating of hair, but that hair is very
much reduced over most of our bodies, and that reduction
probably goes back way beyond Homo sapiens in time.
It probably goes back to the time when the very first early
bipedal hominids came out of the forests in Africa into the
savannahs where they had more
sun and more thermal radiation to cope with.
In places like Europe, Northern Europe, why we
lost body hair is the chicken and egg question.
Did we lose our body hair because we began to wear
clothing to keep us warm or was there some other factor at work
that caused us to lose our body hair?
Perhaps women didn't find body hair on men attractive, and so
it was lost because they didn't choose those men as mates.
There's no way to ever answer that question.
If we were to subscribe
100% to the idea of the survival of the fittest
isn't it illogical to think that all of a sudden
we're completely naked and we're losing all of our fur?
I mean, that makes absolutely no sense because right after we
shed our fur, we had to wear furs to keep warm.
Had we not worn any furs, we would have frozen to death,
we would have died.
So the whole idea that we shed all of our hair in order to
survive because we were stronger, logically makes no sense.
But if Darwin's theory of natural selection
cannot account for the appearance of intelligent
hairless Homo sapiens, what can?
Might the transition of hominids to modern human beings have been
the result of an otherworldly design, as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
Alfred Russel Wallace, a colleague of Darwin, called it
the intelligence evolution.
Darwin believed that the human brain had
been driven into existence by natural selection, but Wallace
couldn't quite see how this could be so.
What Wallace perceived was that the way that humans think,
their intellectual faculties are qualitatively different from
anything that had preceded them, and he couldn't quite see how
this enormous gap could be bridged by natural selection.
So he invoked another explanation for the evolution,
the arrival of modern human cognitive abilities.
His choice was a spiritual explanation.
Alfred believed there was an unseen
creative spirit that was behind all life on our planet.
And he believed that this unseen creative spirit
had interceded three times in this planet.
First was to create life from inorganic matter.
And then the second time was
when animals achieved some kind of consciousness.
And the third time was when humans suddenly were able to
have the mental abilities that we have today.
But he felt that it wasn't just
random selection like Charles Darwin thought.
He believed that all of these changes had a creative
intelligence behind it.
The view that I have is that because the rest of
nature hasn't changed that much, that arguably, we shouldn't.
So that suggests to me we're seeing something potentially
that has gone against nature, and if it's gone against nature,
maybe that means because somebody has been manipulating nature.
There's no explanation for human beings.
They shouldn't be here on this planet.
If we were evolved and changed by an extraterrestrial source
from our early primate ancestors
That's the only way, really, you could've come
from the human species.
Unless you, of course, put god into the equation.
Then, who knows who the gods may have been.
Charles Darwin may be crawling over in his grave right now
but it's very possible that mankind came about
because of extraterrestrial intervention.
Did the evolution of modern humans
really received a jump start by extraterrestrial beings,
as ancient astronaut theorists believe
and if so, might there be tangible evidence.
Some scientists believe proof can be found,
inside the human brain.
Chicago, Illinois.
December 2004.
Researchers at the Howard Hughes Medical lnstitute of the
University of Chicago publish the results of a study that
claims the sophistication of the human brain was the result of a
so-called special event.
They said mankind's intelligence was not only the result of
evolution, and that around 50,000 years ago, the genes of
ancient humans went through an intense amount of change in a
relatively short amount of time--
what some refer to as the big bang of the brain.
No one really knows how human beings developed so fast
in such a short period of time
They don't believe it was done naturally.
It's very clear the fully modern intellectual function
is a very recent acquisition in our lineage.
It's not an improvement of what was there before
it's a new kind of manipulation of information and the mind.
There is no other animal creature on the planet
that has such a comparative point and that is why they call it
the big brain event.
People talk about the missing link.
Where is between the link between going from apes
monkeys, gorillas, ectetera,
to being out to develop atomic weaponry and fly in space.
When we're looking at the origins of man,
we've realised that 50,000 years ago, we really went where
no creature has even gone before.
We have become human.
But what was the spark that spored human intelligence
Was it a genetic mutation brought about
by the natural selection process of evolution
as many mainstream scientists contend
or could've it been a genetic modification
produced by extraterrestrial beings
as ancient astronaut theorists believe?
There's also the idea that there was a gene or genes
that popped up some time in our ancestors
randomly, that might have given the ability
to symbolically represent objects in our environment
or the abstract, those are things that for instance
chimpanzees have a great deal of trouble with
even with the talk language
Homo Sapiens emerging from Africa started to behave symbolically
They started to manipulate information in their mind
in a way their predecessors had never done before
They disassembled the world around them into a vocabulary
of discrete symbols and recombined them
so they could imagine new kinds of worlds
Long long time ago,
extraterrestrials arrived on this planet.
They realised that the planet was full of life
and one of them was the most advanced form
was one of our ancestors.
They took the DNA out
and they changed the basic information in the DNA.
This is what our genetics are doing every day.
Now, the cell was changed, the product you plant into womb
of a female of the same species
This female will give birth to a child approximately after 9 months
but because of this artificial mutation, and that is the difference,
because it was made artificially by the extraterrestrials.
What if as part of the genetics updates
human beings were getting from extraterrestrials
one of those genetic updates involved a software download
biological download to differentiate
the different hemispheres of the brain
to allow human society, tool making, fire, social organization
to be creative, and from that, that particular species
of hominid became the human being we are today.
If alien species out there could
fly across, interstellar space
then in all probability they would have similar DNA
in common and technology.
Of course it would depend on their own genetic composition
being similar to ours
but if they understood sufficient chemistry
and physical principles from their own experience
of their physical world model
then in all probability, manipulating our DNA would be simple.
But if alien beings created humans by genetically
altering our primitive ancestors,
might various versions of hominids have been
the result of experiments at creating intelligent life on Earth,
as ancient astronaut theorists contend?
This is one of the greatest unanswered questions.
The ancient records do not say
that we are part of a social experiment.
The ancient records say that we were bestowed upon this gift.
The gods gave us the gift of intellect.
And it is for us to use it.
So yes, we might actually be part of an experiment, but it
might be an experiment in intelligence.
It might actually be a game,
a kind of the greatest reality TV show, whereby the entire human
species is watched by ancient aliens who have been watching
the show for maybe 50,000 years.
FOXP2 is a gene that was found in our nucleotides
and it is something that sets us completely apart
from any other animal
And scientists have suggested that that gene alone
is responsible for language
And there is absolutely no evidence of origin
where as this thing somehow mutated
from the animal kingdom towards us.
So this gene exists out of nowhere without any origin.
So my question is, is it possible that this gene was
given to us, or grafted into us,
by extraterrestrials in the remote past?
And the answer is yes.
Was it the same non human ancient aliens
so many ancient settlements on this planet
deciding that they wanted humans to be able
to communicate at a more sophisticated level
I think that's the fundamental angst today among people trying
to understand who are we in relationship to extraterrestrials
that may have been manipulating DNA
on this planet for thousands of years.
Might the evidence of our alien origins really have
been passed down to us implanted in our genetic code,
as ancient astronaut theorists believe?
Perhaps further evidence can be found, not by scientists, but
by religious scholars, that claim Adam and Eve really did exist.
The Hebrew Bible.
In it, the Book of Genesis describes how God created the
first two humans, Adam and Eve, in the Garden of Eden and told
them to "go forth and multiply."
For centuries, scientists and theologians have debated whether
this story of the Creation of Man was mere myth or historical fact.
The Torah mentions that humanity is made
out of the dust of the Earth, and that God breathed life into
this to make us animated.
Here is the breath of soul, the breath of vitality,
the divine breath that suggests that with the spark
the life force that makes a human body tick
it's divine in its nature
In 1987, scholars disagreements
over the origin of man intensified
with the discovery that the genetic lineage of every living person
could be traced back to a single woman who once lived in Africa.
It's pretty well established by now
particularly from the molecular, the DNA record
that homo sapiens did originate at one place in Africa
and after having become fully modern in the sense of intellectually modern
spread out to occupy Europe, to occupy Eastern Asia
and the old world in general.
It is sometimes called the Eve model
not meaning that we all descended from the same woman
but it does mean that there was a woman
in that early population migrating out of Africa
who was the only female, who ultimately left her genes
in every modern person.
But is it possible that mainstream science
and the book of Genesis are both pointing to the same
moment in ancient time when modern man first appeared on Earth.
The myth of Adam and Eve, I think, it's not a myth
I think it's a true story
I think Adam and Eve were on this planet
they were the first human beings that we know of
and they helped populate this planet
What is the Garden of Eden?
I think it just happened to be the area
that the genetically manipulated human beings, Adam and Eve,
were placed.
That's where they lived that's where they started to breathe
and that's where the population's planet started to grow
If Adam and Eve actually had existed
as described in the Hebrew Bible,
might this also mean that a serpent really did
tempt them to eat from the tree of knowledge
and if so, might this account have been an effort to describe
the sudden awakening of the modern human mind,
when man first became an intelligent being.
In the Bible says that if you eat from this tree
you will be like god.
Satan in a form of a snake tempted Adam and Eve
and promises them that they will be like god
The knowledge that Adam and Eve acquire
as well as humanity in general
gives man the ability to eventually carry out genetic manipulations
So what was this tree of knowledge?
Is the tree of knowledge in fact a helical DNA sequencing
in our own bodies that was genetically engineered
by extraterrestrials 50,000 years ago?
So that we would have the abilities that we have today?
In my mind, it's our DNA itself that is the Tree of Knowledge.
But why was this suddenly a bad thing?
It would seem that the aliens... some of them wanted us to have
this knowledge, to be like the gods, but others said no, no.
Man is not to have all of this knowledge.
This is also the same story of the Greek god Prometheus, who,
against the orders of the other gods, comes down to Earth and
gives mankind the knowledge of fire.
But because of this gift to mankind, he himself, as a god,
is, like Satan, he's banished from the Earth.
And why?
Because he helped mankind to have greater knowledge.
The whole idea or concept of Satan
is based on a misunderstood visit by extraterrestrials
in the remote past.
According to the ancient astronaut theory,
the reason why we have the idea of a Satan today
is because there might have been some type of a mutiny
between good and bad
extraterrestrial factions in the remote past.
And so the mutineers were cast out by the commander and they
became known as the evil fallen angels,
which they never were.
If as astronaut theorists believe,
extraterrestrials were responsible for providing humans
with intelligence, might they
have also given man the ability to speak?
Our voice box, our larynx is so different than the apes
even the chimpanzee who's our closest cousin
that we are able to produce sounds and produce language.
To a scientist today, that's almost like it was genetically designed
so that we can say words and sing
There really isn't anything more advanced than the human language
So many different cultures, dialects, languages around the world
and the very fact we can communicate on such a deep extensive level
that really sets us apart from all other animals.
Who invented language? Where did that come from?
Was it something instilled in us?
I think there is a mystery to it, that to a large degree science
and the world of history, even archeology are still
scrambling around for answers
Maybe we shouldn't be looking down here for answers
maybe we should be looking up there.
We are told in the bible
that we are made into the image of God What does that mean?
Does it mean that we were made physically in somebody's image?
And so as for the question namely
whether we are descendants from apes
or some other creatures on this planet
or whether we have been truly engineered
can be answered by mythology.
Mythology is able to say that we are not descending from the ape,
but that something happened on this Earth and an alien
intervention came and we were the end result of this.
In my opinion
the extraterrestrials, by an artificial mutation
they created the intelligence of human
Then the extraterrestrial disappeared.
And some of our ancestors had again sex with their ancestors,
with ape-like beings.
And that was called into mythology, "original sin."
Then they return again, the gods, they realized what happened...
and they decided to destroy the whole race by a great flood,
and to restart the experiment
again with what we call in mythology, Noah.
That's all text.
That's the way it is.
It would appear that extraterrestrials came
here, used great apes, other early hominids, created what
would be Neanderthal man, or Homo erectus, somebody similar
to us, and then refined that hominid until they came up with
Homo sapiens... and then the other early
hominids were destroyed.
Might the biblical account of Adam and Eve and
Noah's Ark really be the retelling of extraterrestrial events,
as ancient astronaut theorists believe?
Perhaps further evidence can be found in the archeological
remnants and eyewitness
accounts from man's earliest known civilization.
Northern Iraq
Along the east bank of the Tigris River, opposite the city
of Mosul, lie the ruins of the ancient city of Nineveh,
a place originally inhabited by the Sumerians of Mesopotamia.
Here, in 1842, British archaeologist Austen Henry Layard
unearthed the ruins of the great library of
Assurbanipal, a royal archive containing thousands of clay
tablets with cuneiform inscriptions.
Dating to 3000 BC, the messages carved into stone are considered
to be the world's first written accounts.
Sumerian tablets are probably one of the oldest
form of written record that we have.
They've been translated and tell exciting stories about how
Gods intervene with human beings
and actually had a hand in the creation of human beings.
Whether or not it's just mythology, or if it's fact
no one really knows.
According to interpretations of the sumerian tablets,
the gods were called the Annunaki.
What we are looking at here,
is a sumerian tablet that actually shows the tree of life.
linked by divine beings, you can see here the Annunaki on each side
We also see the winged disc, a symbolic reference that the
Anunnaki had the power of flight.
They actually had necklaces with astronomical references--
a moon, a star, various symbols, which even could be symbolized
as a wristwatch-- technology being used 6,000 years ago.
The written accounts etched into stone
suggest the Annunaki were giant beings, standing eight
feet tall, who came to Earth in search of gold for
their home planet.
When the Sumerian gods, the Anunnaki, realized the
toll it was taking to mine the gold themselves, they decided
to fashion a worker being, a slave to mine the gold for them.
And they explain in the Sumerian creation tales that this was an
arduous process.
So it's very possible that our genetic evolution was a process
done by the Anunnaki to create us in their image and
after their likeness.
They created man according to the sumerian texts.
They created Adam and Eve.
How interesting that the Bible will echo the story
but talked about it in terms of God.
So much like these highly advanced creatures
we're acting as teachers.
And certainly sumerian culture and mythology is full of stories of,
you know, we're saving visitation from these mysterious higher entities
that you know bestowed wisdom and fantastic ideas and concepts.
And, you know, you have to wonder-- is this just down to
myth, or was somebody coming
down and really trying to give us a push, if you like?
Ancient chronicles of sky beings creating human
life are common in early cultures found all over the world.
But while mainstream scholars often dismiss this evidence,
might such tangible historical accounts provide proof of alien
intervention in man's evolution,
as ancient astronaut theorists believe?
The Sumerians are not the only culture
that talks about this.
Also in the Koran, it says that
language was given to us by Allah, or God.
The Maya Popol Vuh says that
language was given to us by the gods.
The ancient Egyptian texts are saying the exact same thing.
It doesn't matter what ancient culture we look at, they all say
the same, that language was a gift from the gods.
We should finally come to grips with the idea
that extraterrestrials had something to do with our development.
Prior to the use of early systems of writing,
ancient people carved symbolic communication into stone.
Called petroglyphs, the oldest
date to about 10,000 to 12,000 years ago.
According to ancient astronaut theorists, petroglyphs located
in the American Southwest link the prehistoric ancestors of the
Zuni and Hopi tribes with star beings.
The first graphic expressions by humans were petroglyphs.
That means symbols or figures scratched into stone.
The Hopi Indians, for example, scratched petroglyphs into their
rock faces that show people with radiating wreaths, gods that
descend from the sky.
The Hopi Indians say that these beings are Kachinas--
beings from space who came to Earth in aircraft, who were not
gods, but who brought them knowledge from another planet.
We have the same phenomenon in Europe, in Valcamonica.
We have it in Asia.
We have it in Brazil.
When we look at the fact that all around the world
we hear similar legends of people from the stars coming
down and having a profound impact on the people of this
country or that particular culture, all embroiled in
similar time frames, you know, we're seeing a pattern
developing, and it's difficult to dismiss that that pattern is suggestive.
In our ancient past, creatures came down, interacted with us,
and maybe manipulated us to become the people we are today.
Why are so many past civilizations all saying similar things?
I think the simple answer is, is that the same thing happened
and they know the story.
And the story is that extraterrestrials came to this
planet, genetically made and manipulated whatever creatures
were here at the time, and helped jump-start society.
The bottom line is every civilization talks about
the existence of man through the eyes of a god, and if you think
of the eyes of the god as ETs, it all makes sense.
Back then, this was the way they communicated events
that were significant to them.
And so when we have this imagery of the so-called star people on
petroglyphs and things like that,
they're clearly chronicling something real,
to my mind at least, that occurred in their history.
The big question is, what?
But while the evidence of contact between
alien beings and early humans is compelling, what if life did not
begin here on Earth, but arrived from somewhere else?
Huntsville, Alabama.
NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Here, in March of 2011, astrobiologist Richard Hoover
reports the extraordinary news that he found micro fossil
organisms-- or ancient bacteria-- inside rare
meteorites that are more than four billion years old, dating
back to the birth of our solar system.
Until recently, scientists did not believe life could survive
the rigors of space travel.
But Hoover's finding suggests that live bacteria made it to Earth
and may have even taken root here.
Microorganism trapped inside the comets
can survive the travel through interplanetary space
and interstellar space.
And the reason is that the
microorganism are trapped in the rocky core.
Around, you have a thick shield of icy material.
And on top, you have a stratification of dust.
Dust is highly effective in
shielding the microorganism from ultraviolet light.
So comet are an excellent vehicle to transport
microorganism, single-cell life,
amino acid in the vastness of space.
Instead of aliens coming to the earth in UFOs
in classic Hollywood terms
a microbial phase of life comes to the earth in a meteorite
survives entering our atmosphere
crashes on the planet and begins to thrive.
The theory that life on Earth began with alien
organisms landing here from
other parts of the universe is controversial.
Called panspermia, one of the most vocal proponents of this
theory was Sir Francis Crick, a British scientist who
co-discovered DNA in 1953.
Francis Crick co-discovered
of the double helix himself.
Said that all this can't happen by chance
that it has to have been engineered.
One of his arguments is that the rotation of the DNA is in the
same direction for all living things.
Had DNA developed on Earth, it would probably have had a 50-50
distribution, and that's exactly what we don't have.
One of the reasons why I think
the theory of panspermia is so incredible
is that it tells you that there is life throughout the universe.
If panspermia is correct, life came here on comets or meteorites,
and we're being seeded, not only on this planet,
but other planets as well.
And it could be part of the great design.
It is the intentional deliberate colonization
of other planets, other worlds by an intelligent race of beings
using not flying saucers landing in the desert somewhere
or in the middle of the sea
but the best way to colonize a planet
you colonize it with your own DNA and let the DNA sprout
into your own species
In terms of our science and technology today,
we have the ability to extract cells and DNA at a genetic level
and save them.
That's how we have so-called test tube babies for couples
who can't have babies.
We preserve the materials for when they need it.
And the day may well come when we send into outer space the
equivalent of, like, Noah's Ark, but instead of sending literal
animals, we send their essence-- their DNA, their genetic makeup.
I don't rule out the idea that we could seed a whole new world.
Today, scientists know that only about five
percent of the DNA contained in
our genes is used to reproduce human beings.
The remainder is an undecipherable code, once
referred to as junk DNA.
But is it really possible that so much of our DNA is unnecessary?
Or might the majority of our DNA
be decoded sometime in the future?
And when it is, what might our
DNA reveal about the origin of modern man?
Just because we cannot decipher
95% of our genetic material doesn't necessarily mean
that that 95% is in fact useless.
Nature is extremely efficient.
DNA is the most powerful storage device in the universe.
Not even with all the supercomputers combined in the
world could we store as much
information as we could store on DNA.
So I'm suggesting that the ultimate proof of
extraterrestrial life will not be found in a crashed spaceship
or in a text, but it will be found within our own genes.
We have so much to learn from studying our own DNA.
We are only just now beginning to decode the human DNA sequence
And as we do that, what we may discover is that
extraterrestrial DNA is built into our own genetics.
Whatever is out there created the universe, this
planet, and other planets and life.
And I strongly believe that this tie-in with whether gods and ETs
were one of the same might very well be the case.
It does not take away from the fact that there's a god, that
there's a higher power, that there's some creation out there
that made the ETs, but I think that layer between God and man
is right in the middle, and that's extraterrestrials
from other planets.
We have to learn that most of our knowledge in religion
is wrong, except one thing there is creation
there is what we call god in all respect
And we have to learn by religion we are very teeny, little beings
in this gigantic universe and
why God is absolutely inexpressible.
It's so gigantic.
It's so wonderful.
So we would never lose God when
we continue to think of extraterrestrials.
God becomes bigger.
Is it really possible that humans evolved
from bacteria growing in some sort of primordial ooze?
Or were we intelligently designed by a higher power--
of extraterrestrial origin--
as ancient astronaut theorists believe?
Perhaps the answer lies within
the very essence of what makes us, human.
And with this knowledge, we may
yet discover our rightful place in the universe.
sync and corrections by Bellows www.addic7ed.com